Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42018627›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

A tale of two coasts: Unveiling US Gulf and Atlantic coastal cities at high flood risk.

Hemal Dey, Wanyun Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hemal DeyDepartment of Geography & the Environment, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7227-9579
Wanyun ShaoDepartment of Geography & the Environment, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1609-7383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coastal flooding is increasing, with accelerating impacts ahead. Its impact, however, can be mitigated through proactive risk management, requiring comprehensive risk assessment. Using the US Gulf and Atlantic Coasts (USGAC) as a test bed, this study develops a framework to identify high-risk coastal cities and reveal underlying factors under dual-risk scenarios-general flood damage (GFD) and extreme flood damage (EFD). Using historical flood damage data and 16 factors representing hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, this study adopts three machine learning models-support vector machine, random forest, and multilayer perceptron-to assess flood risk. This study identifies eight coastal cities at high flood risk where New York City has the largest population at risk (GFD: 4.75 million; EFD: 4.40 million) and New Orleans City has the highest relative exposure (~99% under both). Coastal flood risk is greatest in low-lying, densely developed urban areas with high drainage density. Overall, this scalable framework offers actionable insights for policy-makers to manage floods in other flood-prone regions.

Identifiers

PMID42018627
PMCPMC13101877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.