ArticleBlood2026
Extended HLA haplotypes and transplant survival.
Article in Blood, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractThe benefit of extended phased (∼) HLA class I∼class III∼class II haplotypes in reducing the mortality after hematopoietic cell transplantation is unknown and requires information on functional class III variation. We identified a robust class III single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs915654, informative for mortality and relapse in 1436 patients and their haploidentical related donors through multivariable regression analysis of 26 candidate class III SNPs. Three-marker haplotypes, as defined by 1 class I locus, 1 class II locus, and rs915654 were determined in patients separately from donors. Inclusion of rs915654 into relapse and mortality models already containing patient HLA-E∼DRB1 and donor HLA-B∼DRB1 improved each model (likelihood ratio test P = .06 and P = .004, respectively, for relapse; P = .10 and P = .01, respectively, for mortality). The risks of mortality and relapse increased with decreasing numbers of favorable patient and donor markers. Retesting in an independent cohort of 1141 haploidentical transplants yielded similar results. The number of unfavorable markers additionally increased nonrelapse mortality. HLA-A∼C∼B∼DRB1∼DQB1 haplotypes were defined according to their expected numbers of favorable markers, and the theoretical utility for selecting donors was explored. In summary, extended HLA class I∼class III∼class II haplotypes influence the success of transplantation and inform the biology of the major histocompatibility complex in health and disease. The selection of haploidentical donors for future patients may be optimized with knowledge of donor HLA haplotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.