Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42018609›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2026

Drivers of temporal improvement in CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: a Japanese nationwide registry analysis.

Yu Yagi, Yusuke Kanemasa, Toshiki Terao, Motohiro Kato, Tomoyasu Jo, Tatsu Shimoyama, Toshio Kitawaki, Ryo Hanajiri, Noriko Doki, Satoshi Yoshihara and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Advances in targeted and cellular therapies for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: immunotherapeutic strategies and challenges.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Yu YagiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke KanemasaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9809-2008
Toshiki TeraoDepartment of Hematology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6728-3346
Motohiro KatoDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoyasu JoDepartment of Hematology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Tatsu ShimoyamaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshio KitawakiDepartment of Hematology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Ryo HanajiriDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6034-7909
Noriko DokiHematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8661-3179
Satoshi YoshiharaDepartment of Hematology, Hyogo Medical University Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-2422
Nobuharu FujiiDepartment of Hematology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Noriko IwakiDepartment of Hematology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Go YamamotoDepartment of Hematology, Federation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masatoshi SakuraiDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshihiro MatsukawaDepartment of Hematology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2371-3778
Emiko SakaidaDepartment of Hematology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7254-1928
Yasuhiro NakashimaHematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-723X
Akiyo YoshidaDivision of Transfusion Medicine, Kanazawa University Hospital, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8994-4467
Yoshihiro UmezawaDepartment of Hematology, Institute of Science Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Haryoon KimDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0003-6299-4266
Keisuke KataokaDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki GotoDepartment of Hematology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8361-9973
Yoshiko AtsutaJapanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Nagakute, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4404-2870
Koji KatoDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractReal-world CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is characterized by expanded eligibility and evolving management practices. However, the prognostic impact of these changes remains inconsistent, and the specific drivers of outcomes remain unclear. This study analyzed 913 patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) LBCL from a Japanese registry and compared the outcomes between 2 calendar periods (2019-2021 vs 2022-2024). The 2022-2024 cohort was older, had more adverse baseline features, and was less pretreated. Treatment patterns have shifted toward higher utilization of second-line therapy, a growing preference for axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), and improved disease control before infusion. Accordingly, the 2022-2024 cohort achieved a longer progression-free survival (PFS; 6-month PFS, 63.2% vs 55.2%; P = .005), which persisted after adjusting for baseline characteristics using propensity score matching. Multivariable analysis identified second-line therapy, improved preinfusion disease control, and a shift in product selection from tisagenlecleucel to axi-cel or liso-cel as the primary drivers of this improvement. This benefit was pronounced in high-risk populations, including patients with stable or progressive disease at infusion (6-month PFS, 54.6% vs 43.8%; P = .012) and those who were refractory to first-line therapy (6-month PFS, 51.7% vs 40.3%; P = .013). Despite broader use in higher-risk populations and greater axi-cel exposure, 6-month nonrelapse mortality remained low (2.1% vs 1.5%). Real-world outcomes of CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for R/R LBCL have improved, predominantly driven by second-line therapy, enhanced preinfusion disease control, and increased use of more potent CAR T products.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAdultAgedEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID42018609
PMCPMC13315725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.