Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42018597›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

EconoGNN: A graph neural network framework for temporal economic resilience insights.

Marcus Araujo, Francisco Rodrigues, Elaine Sousa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcus AraujoUniversity of São Paulo (USP), São Carlos, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9512-6710
Francisco RodriguesUniversity of São Paulo (USP), São Carlos, Brazil.
Elaine SousaUniversity of São Paulo (USP), São Carlos, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global economic shocks such as the 2008 financial crisis or recent trade escalations between the United States and China have exposed the complexity of interdependent economies and the need for systemic, multi-agent analysis. However, most regional economic resilience (RER) studies remain limited by localized datasets, inconsistent definitions, and static modeling approaches, restricting their ability to generalize insights across space and time. We introduce EconoGNN, a Graph Neural Network framework that integrates complexity theory, economic modeling, and machine learning to predict and explain regional economic resilience across 183 countries over 25 years. By combining over 81 million trade records (UN COMTRADE) and 500,000 macroeconomic observations (Penn World Table), and adopting an official resilience metric from the World Bank, our approach enables reproducible and interpretable global-scale analysis. EconoGNN achieves F1-scores of 0.750 with the temporal GNN architecture GConvGRU, AUC-ROC of 0.792, and PR-AUC of 0.757, demonstrating robust performance across different recovery threshold settings ([Formula: see text] = 0.90-1.00) with F1-scores ranging from 0.730 to 0.771, and yielding statistically significant improvements (p-value ≤0.05) over baselines. GNNExplainer validation confirms explanation reliability (Fidelity+ = 0.827, Characterization = 0.913), enabling country-customized interpretability of resilience drivers. Moreover the EconoGNN framework integrates key structural and welfare indicators to model both national and cross-border economic interactions, reducing omitted-variable bias and implicitly accounting for political, institutional, and cultural differences.

Indexed as

Models, EconomicChinaGraph Neural NetworksHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID42018597
PMCPMC13102246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.