ArticlePloS one2026
The role of SPP1 in evaluating the prognosis, immune infiltration, and drug sensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSecretory phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) has been linked to tumor progression and immune regulation, but its prognostic value, impact on the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), and drug sensitivity in HCC remain unclear.
methodsWe performed a pan-cancer analysis using TIMER and validated SPP1 upregulation in six GEO datasets (GSE45436, GSE54236, GSE121248, GSE76427, GSE64041, and GSE60502) and HPA protein data. In TCGA-LIHC, we assessed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using univariate/multivariate Cox analyses, ROC analysis, and a calibrated nomogram. We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and performed GO/KEGG and GSEA analyses. Immune infiltration was estimated with CIBERSORT and TIMER, and relationships with immune checkpoints were explored. Drug sensitivity was predicted with pRRophetic using GDSC data. In vitro, SPP1 was knocked down or overexpressed in HCC cell lines to evaluate effects on proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis via qRT-PCR, Western blot, CCK-8, colony formation, wound healing, Transwell invasion, and TUNEL assays.
resultsSPP1 was significantly upregulated in HCC at mRNA and protein levels. High SPP1 predicted poorer OS and PFS and was associated with higher histological grade, advanced stage, and greater T stage. The nomogram showed good calibration and discrimination. DEGs and enrichment analyses implicated cytokine receptor interaction, fatty acid metabolism, and PI3K-Akt signaling; GSEA confirmed immune- and metabolism-related pathways. High SPP1 correlated with higher immune/ESTIMATE scores, increased M0/M2 macrophages and dendritic cells, reduced CD8 + T cells, and upregulation of multiple immune checkpoints. Drug-sensitivity predictions showed high-SPP1 tumors were more sensitive to several anti-cancer drugs (e.g., sorafenib), while resistance to others was suggested. Functionally, SPP1 knockdown inhibited, while overexpression promoted, proliferation, migration, and invasion; knockdown increased apoptosis.
conclusionsSPP1 acts as an oncogenic driver in HCC, associated with poor prognosis, an immunosuppressive TIME, and distinct drug-response patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.