Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42018576›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Using experimental results of protein design to guide biomolecular energy-function development.

Hugh K Haddox, Gabriel J Rocklin, Francis C Motta, Devin Strickland, Samer F Halabiya, Cameron Cordray, Hahnbeom Park, Eric Klavins, David Baker, Frank DiMaio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hugh K HaddoxDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8324-8324
Gabriel J RocklinDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Francis C MottaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0364-5440
Devin StricklandDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Samer F HalabiyaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Cameron CordrayDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Hahnbeom ParkDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Eric KlavinsDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
David BakerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Frank DiMaioDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models of macromolecules have many applications in biochemistry, but physical inaccuracies limit their utility. One class of models uses energy functions rooted in classical mechanics. The standard datasets used to train these models are limited in diversity, pointing to a need for new training data. Here, we sought to explore a new paradigm for training an energy function, where the Rosetta energy function was used to design de novo proteins. Experimental results on these designs were then used to identify failure modes of design, which were subsequently used as a "guiding principle" to retrain the energy function. Specifically, we examined a diverse set of de novo protein designs experimentally tested for their ability to stably fold, identifying unstable designs that were predicted to be stable by the Rosetta energy function. Using deep mutational scanning, we identified single amino-acid mutations that rescued the stability of these designs, providing insight into common failure modes of the energy function. We identified one key failure mode, involving steric clashing in protein cores. We identified similar overpacking when using Rosetta to refine high-resolution protein crystal structures, quantified the degree of overpacking, and refit a small set of energy-function parameters to better recapitulate native-like packing. Following fitting, we largely eliminated the failure mode in the refinement task, while retaining performance on other benchmarks, resulting in an updated version of the Rosetta energy function. This work shows how learning from protein designs can guide energy-function development.

Indexed as

Protein EngineeringProteinsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationModels, MolecularMutationProtein ConformationProtein FoldingThermodynamicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID42018576
PMCPMC13124059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.