ArticlePloS one2026
How survivors of intimate partner violence experience trauma-informed care: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intimate partner violence [IPV] represents a worldwide public health concern, with most survivors experiencing the profound effects of its trauma. Survivors' experiences of trauma-informed programs and approaches, however, are largely unknown. This scoping review therefore aimed to comprehensively map the existing literature on survivors' experiences of IPV related trauma-informed programs and approaches. Additionally, it sought to identify gaps in the literature and highlight recommendations for trauma-informed programs and approaches related to IPV. Databases were systematically searched to identify research studies; 2,841 studies were screened, and 20 studies met inclusion for full review. IPV related programs and approaches that included one or more of six trauma-informed principles [safety; trustworthiness and transparency; peer support; collaboration and mutuality; empowerment, voice, and choice; and/or cultural, historical, and gender issues] were considered. Through employing qualitative content analysis, it was found that these programs and approaches created program satisfaction as well as positive growth and change for survivors. These changes included improved communication skills, emotional and behavioural regulation, confidence and self-worth, and health and wellness. Program dissatisfactions, barriers to entry, and recommendations for future IPV trauma-informed programs were also found to be prevalent. Implications for policy, practice, and future research are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.