ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2026
Salinity and vegetation shape methylotrophic methanogen diversity and potential activity in coastal sediments.
Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anoxic coastal sediments are significant natural sources of the potent greenhouse gas methane where, methylotrophic methanogenesis may predominate. However, the underlying methanogen community composition as well as the impact of salinity levels and vegetation on their diversity and potential activity remain poorly resolved. To assess methane production and characterize methanogen diversity underlying methanol and trimethylamine (TMA) degradation, we incubated anoxic sediments from three sites along the Medway Estuary (UK)-a high-salinity marine site and two brackish sites, one vegetated (saltmarsh with cordgrass) and one non-vegetated. Saltmarsh sediments exhibited the highest methane yields (46% from TMA, 27% from methanol), whereas we did not observe methanogenesis from methanol in the high-salinity marine samples. Methylotrophic methanogen genera Methanolobus, Methanomethylophilus, and Methanofastidiosum were abundant in all original sediments, where metabolic generalist Methanosarcinales were also present. Methanoculleus were the most abundant taxon (31.5%) in original brackish sediments, while they were only at 1% in saltmarsh sediments. Following the amendment with TMA or methanol, Methanolobus dominated all the sediments with methane production (80%-99.5% relative abundance), however Methanoculleus were still in high relative abundance in brackish incubations with methanol or TMA (4.6% and 10%, respectively). These findings indicate that both salinity and vegetation shape the community composition of methylotrophic methanogens in coastal sediments, yet key methylated substrates are primarily metabolized by Methanolobus, regardless of differences in salinity and vegetation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.