Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42018483›Full record

SynthesisFEMS microbiology ecology2026

A systematic review on soil microbial shifts under drought stress: a climate-smart agriculture perspective.

Ndivhuwo Ramatsitsi, Alen Manyevere

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ndivhuwo RamatsitsiDepartment of Agronomy, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, 5700, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7779-3764
Alen ManyevereDepartment of Agronomy, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice, 5700, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4756-0895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major shifts in temperature and rainfall patterns resulting from climate change are projected to continue increasing intensely over the course of the century. Ecosystems' functionality and well-being of above-ground plant community are all significantly impacted by soil microbes' response to these shifting abiotic stresses. With an emphasis on improving their usefulness in climate-smart agriculture (CSA), we reviewed how soil bacteria and fungi tolerate drought stress and improve plant development under water shortage conditions. This systematic analysis used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to elaborate how microbe-based solutions could be incorporated in CSA. A total of 31 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. The review demonstrated that soil microbial diversity and abundance are considerably altered by drought stress, improve resilience of plants, and soil functionality. There was a further observation of high microbial community in the endosphere, and rhizosphere as compared to bulk soil; a clear indication of plants' potential to facilitate soil microbial assemblages. Evidently, plants under drought conditions exude metabolites that stimulate drought-tolerant microbes; that in-turn promote the plants' tolerance to drought. Accordingly, this remarkable synergy between microbes and plants could help forecast how agroecosystems would function in the face of climate change.

Indexed as

AgricultureDroughtsFungiSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaClimate ChangeDrought ResistanceMicrobiotaRhizosphereSoilStress, PhysiologicalSoilclimate changedrought-resistantmicrobial diversityresiliencewater scarcity

Identifiers

PMID42018483
PMCPMC13170800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.