ReviewOral radiology2026
Odontogenic myxoma with rare sunburst periosteal reaction: report of two cases and review of the literature.
Review in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Odontogenic myxoma (OM) is a benign tumor originating from odontogenic ectomesenchyme. While this tumor displays imaging variability, the sunburst appearance is uncommon and can resemble malignant lesions. In this report, we present two cases of OM exhibiting an imaging sunburst appearance, besides a literature review. A 35-year-old woman and a 21-year-old woman presented with mandibular swelling. Imaging exams revealed extensive radiolucent/hypodense images, with the presence of a sunburst periosteal reaction. The main diagnostic hypothesis for both cases was osteosarcoma. Incisional biopsies were performed, with definitive diagnosis of OM. The first patient underwent simple surgical excision, while the second underwent en bloc resection. Neither patient experienced recurrence during the follow-up period of three and one year after treatment. Odontogenic myxoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of jaw lesions presenting a sunburst periosteal reaction, as this atypical imaging pattern may mimic aggressive or malignant conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.