ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Developing and Validating an Islamic Spiritual Health Questionnaire Among Iranian Adults: A PLS‑SEM Approach.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the significance of spiritual health in health psychology literature, existing instruments are mostly grounded in Western frameworks and cannot assess dimensions of Islamic spirituality. The present study sought to develop and validate an Islamic Spiritual Health Questionnaire, grounded in authoritative Quranic and narrative sources, to provide an indigenous, valid instrument for evaluating spiritual aspects rooted in a monotheistic worldview. The study employed a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design. In the qualitative phase, 27 components of spiritual health were extracted from Islamic texts (the Holy Quran, Nahj al-Balāghah, al-Ṣaḥīfah al-Sajjādiyyah, al-Kāfī, and several other hadith collections) through inductive content analysis, yielding 54 items. The content validity of 27 items was then confirmed via CVR and CVI indices based on the opinions of 10 experts in theology and psychology. In the quantitative phase, the 27-item questionnaire was first piloted with 63 participants, yielding an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.946; two items were removed based on participant feedback and expert judgment. In the final stage, the 25-item version was administered to 438 individuals selected via stratified random sampling from the general population, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted using PLS-SEM in SmartPLS 3 software. Exploratory factor analysis identified four main factors: theocentrism, public relations, control of carnal desires, and social responsibility. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that all item loadings exceeded 0.4, and all paths were significant at the 0.05 level (t > 1.96). The indices of convergent validity (AVE > 0.5), discriminant validity, and composite reliability (CR > 0.7) were acceptable for all dimensions. R
Indexed as
Identifiers
42018235What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.