Observational studyAdvances in therapy2026
Effectiveness of Galcanezumab and Traditional Oral Migraine Preventive Medications: Interim 3-Month Japan Subgroup Findings from the TRIUMPH Study.
Observational study in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGalcanezumab, a humanized calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody, is approved in Japan for migraine prevention, but real-world effectiveness data are limited. This analysis describes the 3-month treatment outcomes of galcanezumab and traditional oral migraine preventive medications (TOMPs) in the TReatment of mIgraine: oUtcoMes for Patients in real-world Healthcare systems (TRIUMPH) study's Japan subgroup.
methodsTRIUMPH, an international, prospective, observational, 24-month cohort study, included adults with migraine who initiated or switched to galcanezumab or TOMP. Japan subgroup data were collected from September 2021 to November 2024. Physicians decided on the treatment course in routine clinical practice. The primary outcome was achieving a clinically meaningful response at 3 months, defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine headache days for episodic migraine and ≥ 30% for chronic migraine. Secondary outcomes included changes in migraine headache days and patient-reported outcomes (PROs): Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), Migraine Interictal Burden Scale-4 (MIBS-4), Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQv2.1), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences in the primary analysis. No alpha was allocated for comparative formal testing between treatment groups.
resultsOf 846 patients, 469 received galcanezumab and 377 received TOMPs. In the galcanezumab and TOMP groups, the 3-month weighted response rates were 59.4% and 38.3%, and the reduction in mean migraine headache days from baseline was - 6.2 [95% confidence interval (CI): - 6.9, - 5.5] and - 4.2 (95% CI: - 5.0, - 3.4), respectively. Mean change at 3 months from baseline was numerically higher in the galcanezumab group than in the TOMP group for all the PROs.
conclusionsPatients receiving galcanezumab had numerically greater 3-month response rates and experienced improved PROs after initiating galcanezumab. These real-world findings may help physicians make treatment decisions in clinical settings.
trial registrationEU PAS Register number-EUPAS33068.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.