Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42018194›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2026

Efficacy and Safety of Phrenic-Nerve Sparing Blocks vs. Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Shoulder Surgery.

Jevaughn S Davis, Jason Robart, Boladale R Ashiru, Parth K Patel, Marcus Archibald, Eric Heinz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jevaughn S DavisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 900 23rd Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20037, US. jevdavis@mfa.gwu.edu.
Jason RobartDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 900 23rd Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20037, US.
Boladale R AshiruDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 900 23rd Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20037, US.
Parth K PatelDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Marcus ArchibaldDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Eric HeinzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Mary Washington Healthcare, Fredericksburg, VA, US.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewShoulder arthroplasty is often associated with significant postoperative pain, making effective analgesia a crucial part of surgery day. The interscalene brachial plexus nerve block (ISB) is the gold standard for regional anesthesia in otherwise healthy patients. However, its use is limited by a high incidence of ipsilateral phrenic nerve paralysis, which may result in respiratory compromise, particularly in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), reduced pulmonary reserve, or preexisting diaphragmatic dysfunction. The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) is often cited as high as 100% given the location of the phrenic nerve in relation to the brachial plexus roots, which are blocked with an ISB. This review aims to consolidate current evidence on phrenic-sparing nerve block techniques for postoperative analgesia following shoulder arthroplasty. RECENT

findingsGrowing interest has emerged in alternative regional anesthesia techniques that minimize phrenic nerve involvement while maintaining adequate analgesia. Several phrenic-sparing approaches have been described in recent literature, with varying degrees of efficacy and safety. These techniques aim to reduce the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis while still providing clinically meaningful pain control in the postoperative period. These phrenic sparing nerve blocks include the superior trunk block, the suprascapular block, the infraclavicular block, the axillary block, and the erector spinae block when performed either solo or in combination. Phrenic-sparing nerve blocks represent a promising alternative to ISB, particularly for patients at increased risk of respiratory complications. While current evidence supports their potential to provide effective analgesia with reduced diaphragmatic impairment, further high-quality studies are needed to establish optimal techniques and standardize their use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderBrachial Plexus BlockNerve BlockPhrenic NervePostoperative PainShoulderHumansRespiratory ParalysisAcute pain managementHemidiaphragm paresisInterscalene nerve blockPhrenic nerve blockadePostoperative painShoulder surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.