Rose rosette emaravirus dynamics in eriophyoid mites: implications for virus transmission.

Tobiasz Z Druciarek, Alejandro J Rojas, Ioannis E Tzanetakis

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tobiasz Z DruciarekDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA. tzdrucia@uark.edu.

Alejandro J RojasDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Ioannis E TzanetakisDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA. itzaneta@uark.edu.

Funding

Narodowym Centrum Nauki 2021/43/P/NZ9/03267

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the interaction between rose rosette emaravirus (RRV) and its vectors is pivotal in addressing the epidemic outbreak of rose rosette disease. This study employed quantitative real-time RT-PCR to assess RRV concentration in Phyllocoptes fructiphilus and P. adalius, providing insights into the viral dynamics and vector competency. Our findings suggest an increase in virus titer within P. fructiphilus, a confirmed vector species, unlike P. adalius, highlighting its non-vector status. Furthermore, the study highlights the variability in virus concentration in mites over time, underlining possible developmental stage-specific response and influence of mite lifestyle on RRV retention and replication. This research is the first step in understanding the virus-mite interaction mechanisms, which is essential for developing effective management strategies against rose rosette and potentially other emaravirus-caused diseases.

Indexed as

MitesRNA VirusesAnimalsEmaravirus rosaePhyllocoptes adaliusPhyllocoptes fructiphilusTransmissionVirus titration

Identifiers

PMID42018176

DOI10.1007/s10493-026-01135-w

PMCPMC13102888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.