Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42018128›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

The Emerging Parkinson's Disease Oxylipin-Ome.

Julia C Kelliher, Saranna Fanning

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia C KelliherAnn Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5765-6129
Saranna FanningAnn Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4638-1331

Funding

Ellison Foundation of Boston (SF)NIH HHS R01 NS133243 [SF]The Michael J. Fox Foundation (SF)The Silverstein Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson Disease (PD) is increasingly considered a proteinopathy and lipidopathy. This proteinopathy+lipidopathy paradigm has been further refined to a fatty acid (FA)-opathy, centering dysregulated FA metabolism as fundamental in PD lipid dysfunction. FA dysfunction can disrupt alpha-synuclein (αS)-membrane interactions, altering αS localization, conformation, and aggregation. Correcting FA dyshomeostasis rescues PD-associated αS phenotypes and is a promising strategy for disease-modifying therapeutics. Herein, we consider the impact of PD FA dyshomeostasis in modifying the bioactive oxylipin-ome. Oxylipin metabolism is complex, and the role of oxylipins in PD is not yet fully determined. This perspective considers PD-associated differences oxylipin profiles, oxylipin precursor polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), and oxylipin biosynthetic enzymes in human PD studies to explore a potential PD oxylipin-ome signature. Founded on disrupted oxylipin and oxylipin precursor PUFA abundance, higher PUFA intake reducing PD risk and progression, and the association between cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition and lower PD incidence, we posit that the oxylipin-ome plays a role in PD. Oxylipin metabolism may be a novel target for PD biomarkers and disease-modifying therapeutics.

Indexed as

Fatty AcidsOxylipinsParkinson Diseasealpha-SynucleinFatty Acids, UnsaturatedHumansLipid Metabolismalpha-SynucleinFatty AcidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedOxylipinsfatty acidslipidsmetabolismoxylipinsParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID42018128
PMCPMC13271650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.