ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026
Price development of orphan drugs in Germany after market access and subsequent assessments: a descriptive analysis.
Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOrphan drugs have a special status within early benefit assessment (BA) in Germany, as they are only subject to limited assessment. A regular BA is performed if the annual sales threshold of €30 million is exceeded. We examined the development of prices and costs of orphan drugs that had undergone both assessment procedures. We also described factors that may influence prices and costs.
methodsWe extracted prices and annual treatment costs per patient at two points for each assessment procedure: at the time of the decision on added benefit and after a price change following the assessment. We calculated the percentage changes in prices and described the potential impact of the extent of added benefit and the target population size on the negotiated prices and costs.
resultsWe identified 23 orphan drugs that had undergone both assessment procedures. We found 27 price reductions, 1 constant price and no price increases after limited assessments, and 18 price reductions, 2 constant prices and 3 price increases after regular BAs. On average, prices decreased in both procedures: -14.7% after limited assessments and a further -12.6% after regular BAs. Average annual treatment costs also decreased after both procedures. The extent of added benefit and the target population size had an inconsistent impact on prices and costs.
conclusionLimited assessments and regular BAs of orphan drugs both lead to price reductions in most cases. The extent of added benefit and the target population size can only partially explain the large heterogeneity of results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42018120What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.