Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42018120›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026

Price development of orphan drugs in Germany after market access and subsequent assessments: a descriptive analysis.

C Balg, K Frangen, A C Brockhaus, S Sturtz, A Schwalm, S Mostardt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C BalgDepartment of Health Economics, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Siegburger Str. 237, Cologne, 50679, Germany. Christiane.Balg@iqwig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4258-7748
K FrangenDepartment of Health Economics, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Siegburger Str. 237, Cologne, 50679, Germany.
A C BrockhausDepartment of Medical Biometry, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Siegburger St. 237, Cologne, 50679, Germany.
S SturtzDepartment of Medical Biometry, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Siegburger St. 237, Cologne, 50679, Germany.
A SchwalmDepartment of Health Economics, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Siegburger Str. 237, Cologne, 50679, Germany.
S MostardtDepartment of Health Economics, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Siegburger Str. 237, Cologne, 50679, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOrphan drugs have a special status within early benefit assessment (BA) in Germany, as they are only subject to limited assessment. A regular BA is performed if the annual sales threshold of €30 million is exceeded. We examined the development of prices and costs of orphan drugs that had undergone both assessment procedures. We also described factors that may influence prices and costs.

methodsWe extracted prices and annual treatment costs per patient at two points for each assessment procedure: at the time of the decision on added benefit and after a price change following the assessment. We calculated the percentage changes in prices and described the potential impact of the extent of added benefit and the target population size on the negotiated prices and costs.

resultsWe identified 23 orphan drugs that had undergone both assessment procedures. We found 27 price reductions, 1 constant price and no price increases after limited assessments, and 18 price reductions, 2 constant prices and 3 price increases after regular BAs. On average, prices decreased in both procedures: -14.7% after limited assessments and a further -12.6% after regular BAs. Average annual treatment costs also decreased after both procedures. The extent of added benefit and the target population size had an inconsistent impact on prices and costs.

conclusionLimited assessments and regular BAs of orphan drugs both lead to price reductions in most cases. The extent of added benefit and the target population size can only partially explain the large heterogeneity of results.

Indexed as

Added benefitAMNOGCostOrphan drugsPost-approval assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.