Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42018032›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026

Does laparoscopic experience affect the acquisition of initial robotic skills? A systematic review.

Kamil Rapacz, Jaroslaw Szymanski, Tomasz Rogula

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kamil RapaczJagiellonian University Medical College, Doctoral School of Medical and Health Sciences, Krakow, Poland. kamil.rapacz@uj.edu.pl.
Jaroslaw SzymanskiInstitute of Psychology, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.
Tomasz RogulaDHR Health Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Edinburg, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical robotics has become an integral component of modern minimally invasive surgery, with widespread adoption across nearly all surgical specialties and a continuously increasing procedural volume worldwide. The growing predominance of robot-assisted procedures has raised concerns regarding surgical training, particularly whether reduced exposure to conventional laparoscopy may affect skill acquisition among trainees. Consequently, the optimal role of laparoscopic experience in robotic surgery training remains debated, prompting this review to evaluate whether laparoscopic skills transfer to robotic platforms. This study presents a comprehensive review of the literature evaluating the impact of prior laparoscopic experience on the acquisition of initial robotic surgical skills. A comprehensive and systematic search of the literature was conducted across following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrails.gov and guideline.gov. The present systematic review was performed in compliance with PRISMA statement recommendations. Fourteen of the 30 included studies (47%) demonstrated evidence in favor of laparoscopic skill transfer to robotic initial performance. In four studies, no definitive conclusions regarding skill transfer could be drawn. Although some studies suggest that prior laparoscopic experience may ease the early learning phase of robotic surgical skills, particularly for complex tasks and among novice learners, this transfer is neither absolute nor sufficient to replace dedicated robotic training, which should be considered as the primary method for acquiring robotic surgical skills.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansEducationLaparoscopic surgeryResidencyRobotic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.