ReviewJournal of chemical ecology2026
Advances and Prospects in Odour-based Management of Filth Flies.
Review in Journal of chemical ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unscented and scented LDPE trash bags do not alter blow fly attraction to vertebrate remains.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-enabled chemical ecology for integrated pest management: from volatiles to field applications.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2026Review
- Influence of Decomposition Dynamics of Plant-Animal Organic Matter on Distribution Patterns of Calyptrate Flies.Insects · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Filth flies are groups of dipteran species closely associated with human and animal faeces, food waste, or carrion. They include species such as the house fly (Musca domestica), face fly (Musca autumnalis), bazaar fly (Musca sorbens), false stable flies (Muscina stabulans, Muscina levida), lesser house fly (Fannia canicularis), stable flies (Stomoxys spp.), horn fly (Haematobia irritans), neglected blood feeder fly (Musca crassirostris), oriental latrine fly (Chrysomya megacephala), green bottle fly (Lucilia sericata), Australian sheep blowfly (Lucilia cuprina) and blue bottle fly (Calliphora vicina). Thriving on decomposing organic waste, sewage, animal faeces, and carrion, these flies act as mechanical vectors of viruses, bacteria, protozoa, and helminths. They also cause direct harm through annoyance, stress, skin lesions, blood loss, and immunosuppression. In humans, contact with contaminated items, body parts, or food results in diseases such as trachoma, chlamydia, cholera, and gastrointestinal infections. In livestock, infestations lead to reduced weight gain and milk yield, causing economic losses exceeding USD 2 billion annually. Like all insects, filth flies rely heavily on olfaction to locate food, mates, oviposition sites, shelters, and to avoid danger. Identifying the odour cues that guide these behaviours offers promising opportunities for control, particularly when integrated into trapping or repellent systems. This review summarises current knowledge on filth fly management using odour cues. It explains the nature of these cues and their detection mechanisms in insects, discusses studies applying them for monitoring, attraction, repellency, or mass trapping, and highlights key considerations for developing effective odour-based control strategies. The review provides a useful reference for veterinarians, entomologists, chemical ecologists, industry, and funding agencies seeking sustainable alternatives for managing filth flies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.