ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Global research trends in robot-assisted pyeloplasty: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP), as a minimally invasive technique, is increasingly employed for treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), particularly in pediatric patients. A rapidly expanding body of literature explores its technical feasibility, clinical efficacy, and potential advantages over conventional surgical approaches. However, a comprehensive understanding of the global research landscape and evolving research focus in the RAP field remains limited. This study employs bibliometric and visualization analysis of publications retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) to describe publication trends, geographic and institutional contributions, collaborative networks, and thematic evolution in RAP research. Results demonstrate a steady increase in RAP-related publications since the late 20th century, reflecting sustained academic interest and clinical application. The United States emerges as a major contributor in publication output and international collaboration, followed by several European and Asian countries. High-frequency keyword analysis identified UPJO, pyeloplasty, robotic surgery, and pediatric urology as core research themes. Keyword outbreak analysis further reveals that research focus has shifted markedly from early system-oriented and experience-based studies toward outcome-oriented and evidence-based research, with recent attention turning to emerging technologies such as meta-analyses and single-port robotic surgery. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the knowledge structure and developmental trajectory of RAP research, offering valuable insights into current research hotspots and potential future directions. These findings may inform clinical practice and guide further research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42018024What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.