ArticlePsychological research2026
The asymmetric bias: race-based lightness perception fades only for female faces, not for male.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research has shown that race and gender information can influence the perceived lightness of faces, as social categorization may introduce biases in perception and memory. However, individuals cannot easily process one facial attribute in isolation. To address this, this study systematically examined the joint effects of race and gender on perceived face lightness across two experiments: the first employed a simultaneous lightness matching task, while the second utilized a delayed lightness matching task. The results revealed a critical gender-based asymmetry. For male faces, the classic race-based lightness bias (with Caucasian faces perceived as lightest, African faces as darkest, and Asian faces as intermediate) was observed and remained stable across both perceptual and memory stages. In contrast, the influence of race on female faces was more complex: a racial lightness bias (with Caucasian faces perceived as lightest, African faces as intermediate, and Asian faces as darkest) was present during initial perceptual processing, but this bias was not maintained in the subsequent memory-based task. Regarding participant gender effects, faces were generally perceived as lighter by male participants than by female participants during perceptual processing. In the memory-based task, however, these participant gender differences in perceived lightness were no longer observed. These results provide the novel insight that social category influences are not uniform but are gated by category intersectionality (race ✕ gender) and processing stage, revealing a uniquely dynamic perceptual status for female faces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42017995What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.