Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42017860›Full record

GuidelineGastroenterology2026

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Risk Stratification and Emerging Surveillance Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Expert Review.

Nicole E Rich, Augusto Villanueva, Jorge A Marrero, Fasiha Kanwal

Abstract readReviewPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicole E RichDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Augusto VillanuevaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York.
Jorge A MarreroDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Fasiha KanwalDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Institute of Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Houston, Texas; Texas Medical Center Digestive Diseases Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: kanwal@bcm.edu.

Funding

Liquid biopsy and radiomics for liver cancer surveillanceU01CA283931 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI TAOULI, BACHIR, VILLANUEVA, AUGUSTO · 2023 to 2025
$3.3M
Determining the influence of sex and gender in hepatocellular carcinoma risk and survivalK08CA259536 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Nicole Elizabeth Rich · 2022 to 2026
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA259536NCI NIH HHS U01 CA283931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

descriptionHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death in patients with cirrhosis. Although advancements in surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies have improved outcomes for patients with early-stage HCC, most cases are diagnosed at later stages due to both the limitations of currently recommended surveillance modalities and their underuse, with fewer than 1 in 4 patients with cirrhosis receiving surveillance for this tumor. Current guidelines recommend semiannual surveillance with ultrasound and α-fetoprotein, but this strategy has suboptimal sensitivity, and alternative imaging techniques (eg, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) have their own risks and challenges with implementation. HCC surveillance has established benefits in certain at-risk populations, including patients with cirrhosis (of any etiology) and selected patients with chronic hepatitis B virus. The burden of HCC is rising most rapidly among patients with nonviral liver diseases, including metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and alcohol-associated liver disease, among whom the annual incidence rate of HCC is significantly lower than was previously observed in patients with viral hepatitis. This underscores the need for better biomarker and risk-stratification tools to detect HCC earlier and improve surveillance efficiency, although integrating them into routine clinical practice presents a significant challenge. This American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update aims to provide Best Practice Advice on emerging strategies for HCC risk stratification and surveillance.

methodsThis Expert Review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on this topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external review procedures through the standard review process for Gastroenterology. These Best Practice Advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Because a systematic review was not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings of the quality of available evidence or the strength of the presented advice. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: The best strategy for reducing hepatocellular carcinoma morbidity and mortality is to prevent cirrhosis. These strategies include vaccination and treatment of viral hepatitis (eg, hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus), recognizing and treating alcohol use disorder, managing metabolic syndrome, and addressing liver diseases at early stages. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: The preferred current surveillance strategy for patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma is semiannual ultrasound and α-fetoprotein in combination. The benefits of surveillance include a higher likelihood of detecting early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma, access to curative therapy, and improved survival. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Among patients without cirrhosis, only a subset of those with chronic hepatitis B virus should undergo hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance; surveillance is not advised for those without cirrhosis from other etiologies due to the low annual incidence rate. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Although the benefits of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance are well established, it is important for clinicians to consider the potential physical, psychological, and financial harms associated with the process. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Several novel blood-based biomarkers, such as GALAD, and radiologic biomarkers are undergoing clinical validation. Some are already commercially available, but evidence is insufficient to support their use in routine hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance. These assays should not replace guideline-recommended tests, although their accessibility and potential cost-effectiveness may support broader use once sufficiently validated. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Multicancer blood-based biomarker detection panels should not be used in the screening or surveillance of patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Many hepatocellular carcinoma risk-stratification scores exist for patients with cirrhosis. However, few scores have undergone sufficient validation to support their use in clinical practice. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Among patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection without cirrhosis, PAGE-B and REAL-B scores can stratify patients based on their future risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularEarly Detection of CancerGastroenterologyLiver NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansLiver CirrhosisPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUltrasonographyBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerLiver CancerPrediction ModelsRisk ScoresScreeningSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID42017860
PMCPMC13293225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.