ArticleThe breast journal2026
Characterization of Novel MRI Findings in Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Diagnostic Significance and Clinical Perspectives.
Article in The breast journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterization of Novel MRI Findings in Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Diagnostic Significance and Clinical Perspectives.The breast journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIdiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is an uncommon, benign, chronic inflammatory breast disease that frequently mimics carcinoma both clinically and radiologically, posing diagnostic challenges. While classical imaging manifestations have been described, the full spectrum of MRI features remains incompletely characterized. This study aimed to identify and characterize novel MRI descriptors of histopathologically confirmed IGM and assess their reproducibility and potential clinical implications.
methodsIn this retrospective single-center study, 45 consecutive women with biopsy-proven IGM were evaluated using 1.5 T breast MRI. Imaging protocols included T2-weighted fat-suppressed, T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences. Two experienced radiologists, blinded to clinical and pathological data, independently reviewed all cases for classical and novel MRI features. Interobserver agreement was assessed using raw agreement and Cohen's κ statistics. Associations between imaging descriptors and clinical-demographic variables were tested with nonparametric methods.
resultsThe most common MRI pattern was a heterogeneously enhancing mass with concomitant nonmass enhancement (NME) (75.6%), followed by rim-enhancing microabscesses (62.2%) and isolated NME (48.9%). Four novel MRI features were identified: spherical transformation of mammary fat lobules (62.2%), disruption of fibroglandular tissue architecture (73.3%), ring-like enhancement with asymmetric wall morphology (46.6%), and nipple-areolar complex retraction (11.1%). Interobserver reproducibility was high (κ = 0.786-1.000; raw agreement > 90%). Novel descriptors, particularly spherical lobule transformation, fibroglandular disruption, and ring-like enhancement, were strongly associated with NME (all p < 0.001), but not with age or lesion laterality.
conclusionThese imaging descriptors may contribute to a better radiologic understanding of the morphological manifestations of IGM and may assist radiologists in recognizing imaging patterns associated with granulomatous inflammation. However, given the retrospective design and absence of a comparative cohort, these findings should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.