Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42017757›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

A Bourdieusian Approach to the Demobilisation of Brazil's AIDS Movement.

Helena de Moraes Achcar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Helena de Moraes AchcarSão Paulo School of Administration, Getúlio Vargas Foundation, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6824-6969

Funding

Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/07849-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article offers a Bourdieusian analysis of the demobilization of Brazil's AIDS movement, once a globally celebrated force in shaping innovative, rights-based public health responses. Drawing on extensive qualitative data, I argue that the movement's decline cannot be explained solely by institutional co-optation, biomedicalisation, or defunding, as suggested in previous scholarship. Instead, I conceptualise demobilisation as a deeper process of depoliticisation that emerges from transformations in the distribution of capital, shifts in habitus, and structural changes in the field of power under neoliberalism. I trace how the pauperisation of the epidemic brought into the field new agents with different dispositions, challenging the movement's politicised doxa forged in the 1980s and 1990s and fragmenting the field. The analysis emphasises the role of symbolic struggles over legitimacy and the effects of changing political-economic logics on activist practices. By combining field theory with a grounded empirical study of Brazil's AIDS movement, the article contributes to broader debates on the sociology of social movements, the neoliberal restructuring of civil society and the conditions of possibility for re-politicisation.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeBrazilHumansPoliticizationPolitics

Identifiers

PMID42017757
PMCPMC13101752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.