Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42017669›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2026

Bio-Rad and QIAGEN digital PCR platforms provide equivalent quantification for wastewater-based SARS-CoV-2 surveillance.

Thomas Clerkin, Steph Smith, Kevin Zhu, Denene Blackwood, Javier Gallard-Góngora, Drew Capone, Joe Brown, Rachel T Noble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas Clerkin *Department of Earth, Marine, and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Morehead City, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5239-8266
Steph Smith *Department of Earth, Marine, and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Morehead City, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3709-4464
Kevin ZhuDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Denene BlackwoodDepartment of Earth, Marine, and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Morehead City, North Carolina, USA.
Javier Gallard-GóngoraDepartment of Earth, Marine, and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Morehead City, North Carolina, USA.
Drew CaponeDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2138-6382
Joe BrownDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5200-4148
Rachel T NobleDepartment of Earth, Marine, and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Morehead City, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9071-8312

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Hazel B Nichols · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126UNC | UNC-CH | North Carolina Policy Collaboratory Tracking SARS-CoV-2 in the Wastewater Across a Range of North Carolina Municipalities
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital PCR (dPCR) is increasingly used for wastewater surveillance due to its precision, absolute quantification, and reduced sensitivity to inhibition compared to quantitative PCR (qPCR). Although the Bio-Rad QX200 and QIAGEN QIAcuity dPCR platforms are widely adopted, their performance has not been directly compared for wastewater applications. We conducted a blinded comparison of these platforms using 93 archived wastewater influent samples from North Carolina collected in 2021-2022, spanning three orders of magnitude in SARS-CoV-2 concentration (1 × 10

Indexed as

COVID-19Polymerase Chain ReactionSARS-CoV-2WastewaterAnimalsHumansNorth CarolinaSensitivity and SpecificityWastewater-Based Epidemiological MonitoringWastewaterCDC NWSSdigital PCRdroplet digital PCRmethod validationplatform comparisonpublic health surveillancequantitative detectionSARS-CoV-2wastewater-based epidemiologywastewater surveillance

Identifiers

PMID42017669
PMCPMC13188893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.