Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42017632›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2026

Long-term Outcomes of Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complex Aortic Aneurysms in a High-volume Aortic Center.

Petroula Nana, George Apostolidis, Giuseppe Panuccio, Jose I Torrealba, Daour Yousef-Al-Sarhan, Fiona Rohlffs, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Tilo Kölbel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Petroula NanaGerman Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9060-8519
George ApostolidisGerman Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Giuseppe PanuccioGerman Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jose I TorrealbaGerman Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Daour Yousef-Al-SarhanGerman Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Fiona RohlffsDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Nikolaos TsilimparisDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximillian University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Tilo KölbelGerman Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study presents the experience of a high-volume aortic center on fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair (f/bEVAR).

backgroundMaterial and technique evolutions in f/bEVAR improved its outcomes but long-term data is limited.

methodsFollowing STROBE, a retrospective single-center study of consecutive (elective/urgent) patients managed with f/bEVAR [custom-made (CMD) and off-the-shelf devices] between 2010 and 2024 was conducted. Technical success, 30-day mortality and spinal cord ischemia (SCI), and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.

resultsA total of 916 patients were included (73.6% males, 71.7±0.6 y, 81.7% degenerative; 20.8% urgent). Juxtarenal aneurysms were managed in 33.5% and thoracoabdominal (TAAA) in 54.1%. Staging was performed in 26.0%. CMD were used in 74.4% (fenestrated: 37.1%; branched: 28.9%). Technical success was 93.6%, with urgent setting ( P <0.001) and TAAA II ( P =0.03) being independently associated. Thirty-day mortality was 7.4% (4.4% in elective); independently related to aortic rupture ( P =0.03). SCI was 16% (12.7% in elective) with 2.9% nonrecovery grade 3 SCI (2.3% in elective) and related to aortic rupture ( P =0.009) and use of off-the-shelf devices ( P <0.001). Survival was 82.6% (SE 1.9%) at 60 months. Freedom from aorta-related mortality was 89.2% (SE 1.3%) at 48 months. Cox regression identified age ( P =0.002), ASA ≥4 ( P =0.02), and SCI ( P <0.001) related to worse survival. Freedom from any aortic reintervention was 40.0% (SE 2.5%) at 60 months with technical success ( P <0.001) being related.

conclusionsUrgencies negatively affect the early f/bEVAR outcomes. Grade 3 SCI rate was acceptable, especially in elective cases. Survival was over 80% at 60 months, despite frequent reinterventions.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAortic Aneurysm, ThoracicBlood Vessel ProsthesisBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationEndovascular Aneurysm RepairEndovascular ProceduresAgedAortic Aneurysm, ThoracoabdominalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitals, High-VolumeHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignRetrospective Studiesbranchedendovascular aortic repairfenestratedlong-termspinal cord ischemiasurvival

Identifiers

PMID42017632
PMCPMC13344400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.