ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026
Freshwater habitats within the Natura 2000 network.
Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Freshwater habitats within the Natura 2000 network.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Freshwater biodiversity is experiencing dramatic declines. Despite improvements, the trend remains negative, underlining that effective and coordinated initiatives are needed. Protected areas are considered a global cornerstone of biodiversity conservation, and in Europe, the Natura 2000 network plays a central role in safeguarding biodiversity. In the present study, we examine if designated Annex I listed freshwater habitats of the Habitats Directive are sufficiently represented to enable conservation and restoration efforts, as outlined in Article 4 of the European Nature Restoration Law (NRR), to meaningfully contribute to reversing the ongoing decline in freshwater biodiversity. Additionally, we examine whether freshwater habitats are represented across their full natural geographical range, addressing a key spatial component of long-term persistence, as reflected in the concept of "favorable reference area" as defined in Article 3 of the NRR. We found that freshwater habitats cover 6.2% of the total area of Natura 2000 sites with running waters covering only 0.4%. In addition to a low spatial coverage, the analyses also indicated that several freshwater Annex I habitats are not represented across their full natural geographical range. Based on the obtained results, we therefore argue that a systematic strengthening of the Natura 2000 network is required, with particular emphasis on: (1) expanding the extent of designated freshwater habitat types in- and also outside the existing network if necessary to adequately cover freshwater habitats, and (2) identifying and addressing representation gaps across all relevant biogeographic regions. To support this process, we have developed a webtool based on the datasets underlying the analyses, which enables relevant stakeholders including EU institutions, national agencies, and local managers to examine the distribution of freshwater habitats and species protected within the current Natura 2000 network. The webtool can be accessed at https://www.waterwebtools.com/merlin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.