ArticleAnales del sistema sanitario de Navarra2026
Qualitative evaluation of a community intervention in educational centres: Opinion of the professionals involved.
Article in Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConsulta Joven is a community intervention developed in primary care to address adolescents´ health needs. It offers open health consultations in secondary schools within a context of trust and confidentiality and is complemented by additional health promotion activities. This study explores the perceptions of professionals involved in the programme regarding challenges and key elements influencing its implementation.
methodsA qualitative, descriptive-interpretive approach study was conducted in primary care in Mallorca (Spain) in 2017. Participants were recruited by Consulta Joven coordinators using purposive theoretical sampling. Three focus groups were conducted with ten nurses, four physicians, and six teachers. Two researchers independently coded transcripts using a general inductive approach. Categories were developed through content analysis and refined through team discussion.
resultsFour categories emerged: Perceived value and usefulness of Consulta Joven, Barriers to implementation, Key elements for programme development, and Proposals for improvement. Participants described Consulta Joven as an effective strategy to reach adolescents, promote healthy behaviours, and identify health problems before they seek medical care. Trust and confidentiality are highlighted as essential for its success, along with intersectoral collaboration with community stakeholders. Conclusions, Professionals perceive Consulta Joven as a useful intervention to adolescent health promotion. Strengthening institutional support and collaboration between the health and education sectors, and introducing the programme at earlier educational stages, may enhance its preventive impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.