Trial reportEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2026
Dynamic versus fixed pillow height systems and cervical muscle function: a randomized crossover trial.
Trial report in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPillow height and mechanical support influence cervical alignment and neuromuscular load. However, the physiological effects of dynamically adjustable pillow systems remain poorly defined.
aimTo compare the effects of fixed and dynamically adjustable pillow height inserts on cervical muscle oxygenation, neuromuscular modulation, and comfort in healthy young adults.
designRandomized crossover trial.
settingControlled laboratory setting simulating sleep-related postures. POPULATION: Thirty healthy adults (18-45 years) without cervical or musculoskeletal disorders.
methodsParticipants underwent six pillow conditions: no pillow (NP), non-adjustable polyester pillow (NA), three fixed inserts (memory foam [MF], latex [LT], polyester fiber [PE]), and a dynamically adjustable air-based (DA). Muscle oxygen saturation (SmO<inf>2</inf>) of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and upper trapezius (UT) was assessed using near-infrared spectroscopy. Surface electromyography (EMG) was analyzed via root mean square (RMS) and zero-crossing (ZC) slopes, representing adaptive motor unit recruitment and firing modulation.
resultsRepeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant pillow effect for SmO<inf>2</inf> (SCM: η
conclusionsDA pillows may enhance cervical oxygenation, adaptive neuromuscular control, and comfort compared with fixed-height systems. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: DA pillows may provide individualized ergonomic support to improve cervical alignment and comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.