ArticleJournal of anatomy2026
An investigation of the functional significance of the pyramidalis muscle using shear wave elastography.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pyramidalis (Py) is a small triangular-shaped anterior abdominal wall muscle, the function of which remains uncertain. We used brightness-mode (B-mode) ultrasound to determine Py prevalence and tested the hypothesis that Py contributed to stiffness of the linea alba (LA) using shear wave elastography (SWE). Py prevalence was observed and documented using conventional B-mode ultrasound in 20 participants (7 male). LA stiffness was measured using SWE with Py relaxed and during Py contraction in 10 of the participants (3 male, mean [SD] age 26.3 ± 8.0 years). Py activity was controlled using neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), while lower rectus abdominis activity was monitored using electromyography (EMG). Py was present bilaterally in 15 of 20 (75%) participants, unilaterally in 2 (10%) and absent in 3 (15%). A statistically significant difference (p < 0.002) in the mean LA stiffness was observed when comparing SWE measurements of the Py at relaxed (15.7 kPa ± 6.1 kPa, 95% CI 11.4-20.1 kPa) and during contraction (24.2 kPa ± 10.8 kPa, 95% CI 16.5-32.0 kPa). No statistically significant difference in lower rectus abdominis activity was observed between the presence and absence of NMES (p = 0.517), indicating accurate and isolated Py stimulation. Our results indicate that Py muscle is commonly present (75% participants) and that Py contraction results in a significant increase in LA stiffness, supporting the previously unvalidated hypothesis that the function of Py, at least in part, is to increase LA stiffness and contribute to the biomechanics of the trunk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.