SynthesisInternational journal of cancer2026
Clinical Benefit and Safety of Combined Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Prostate Cancer.
Synthesis in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although immunotherapy has transformed the treatment of several genitourinary malignancies, its role in prostate cancer remains limited. Combining immunotherapy with targeted therapies has emerged as a promising approach to enhance immune responses in prostate cancer. We aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. We conducted a detailed literature search across Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to include clinical trials enrolling adults with histologically confirmed prostate cancer treated with a combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to a registered protocol. A total of 21 studies from 19 clinical trials, encompassing 5702 participants, were included. The studies evaluated 12 unique therapeutic combinations involving six targeted agents and four immunotherapies. Seven trials compared combination therapy with monotherapy. Pooled analyses showed that combination therapy significantly improved disease control rate (RR = 1.42), complete response (RR = 2.56), and partial response (RR = 2.13), albeit with a higher incidence of adverse events. In single-arm studies, the pooled median progression-free survival was 5.14 months, and median overall survival was 16.79 months. The androgen receptor signaling inhibitor subgroup exhibited longer survival than the PARP inhibitor subgroup. Combination immunotherapy and targeted therapy demonstrate superior efficacy over monotherapy in prostate cancer but increase the risk of toxicity. These promising results warrant further validation in large-scale, well-designed randomized trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.