Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42017308›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026

Genetic Architecture of Trans-Laminar Cribrosa Pressure Difference and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

In-Shik Hong, Chamlee Cho, Beomsu Kim, Injeong Shim, Yeong Chan Lee, Sang-Hyuk Jung, Minku Song, Sanghyeon Park, Sanghoon Hong, Hyeonbin Jo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

In-Shik HongDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chamlee ChoDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Beomsu KimDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Injeong ShimDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yeong Chan LeeDepartment of Physiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Hyuk JungDepartment of Medical Informatics, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Minku SongDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sanghyeon ParkDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sanghoon HongDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyeonbin JoDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hoyoung KimDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Je Hyun SeoVeterans Medical Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hong-Hee WonDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the genetic architecture of translaminar cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD) provides genetic insights based on dual-pressure theory beyond intraocular pressure (IOP) and whether a TLCPD-based polygenic risk score (PRS) predicts primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) risk and its pleiotropic effects. Methods: The genome-wide association study (GWAS) of TLCPD was conducted in 82,147 individuals of European ancestry from the UK Biobank (UKBB). Functional enrichment analysis and colocalization analysis were performed to identify associated genes, tissues, and pathways. PRS was calculated in an independent set of 268,734 unrelated European-ancestry individuals not included in the TLCPD GWAS. A survival analysis was utilized to examine the association between the PRS for TLCPD and the incidence of POAG. The phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) of PRS was applied to identify associations between TLCPD and other diseases. Results: We identified 77 independent loci, including 12 previously unreported loci. Enrichment and colocalization analyses identified candidate genes related to retinal cell death, including SDCCAG8, PILRB, FBXO46, NUPR1, and JUND, which were not previously associated with elevated IOP. Individuals in the top 1% of the PRS had a 4.48-fold higher risk of developing POAG than those in the bottom 20% (95% confidence interval = 3.70-5.43). PheWAS identified TLCPD PRS-associated traits including hypertension, glaucoma, obesity, arthropathies, and sleep apnea. Conclusions: This study identified TLCPD-associated variants, genes, cell types, tissues, and diseases in UKBB participants of European ancestry. These findings support the clinical relevance of TLCPD in glaucoma pathogenesis, implicating TLCPD-related genetic variants as contributor to POAG susceptibility.

Indexed as

Glaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressureAgedFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic Risk ScoreGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideUK BiobankUnited KingdomWhite People

Identifiers

PMID42017308
PMCPMC13107994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.