ArticleNMR in biomedicine2026
Input Layer Regularization and Automated Regularization Hyperparameter Tuning for Myelin Water Estimation Using Deep Learning.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a deep learning framework that combines classical regularization and data preprocessing to improve estimation of the myelin water fraction (MWF) in the brain from magnetic resonance relaxometry data. The proposed method is developed within the context of biexponential signal modeling, a standard approach for quantifying MWF. Building on prior work on input layer regularization (ILR), we introduce several key extensions. First, we incorporate optimal regularization hyperparameter selection using either a dedicated neural network or generalized cross-validation (GCV), applied on a signal-by-signal (or pixel-by-pixel) basis to generate concatenated input features. Second, we extend the framework to directly estimate MWF in addition to exponential time constants. On synthetic data, the proposed architecture outperforms both conventional regularized fitting methods and standard multilayer perceptrons. When applied to in vivo brain data, it again yields superior accuracy, with GCV-based parameter selection performing slightly better than the neural network alternative. These findings demonstrate that ILR enhances MWF estimation within the biexponential model and that classical regularization techniques, when integrated with deep learning, can substantially improve quantitative estimation of myelin content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.