Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42017135›Full record

ArticleSexual medicine2026

Correlatıonal effect of sexual myths on sexual qualıty of lıfe in pregnancy: a cross-sectıonal study.

Gizem Citak, Tugce Gorucu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gizem CitakDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, 60150, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5484-2233
Tugce GorucuGraduate School of Education, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, 60150, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3563-041X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sexual myths during pregnancy can shape women's beliefs about sexuality, increase anxiety, and reduce sexual satisfaction, thereby negatively affecting sexual quality of life. Aim: This study examined the relationship between sexual myths prevalent during pregnancy and women's sexual quality of life using a cross-sectional, correlational design. Methods: Conducted between January and April 2025, this study included 332 pregnant women attending the obstetrics outpatient clinic and wards of a university hospital. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a Personal Information Form, the Sexual Myths Scale, and the Sexual Quality of Life Scale. Outcomes: The primary outcome was sexual quality of life, assessed in relation to the level of endorsement of sexual myths during pregnancy. Results: Sexual myths varied significantly according to age, education, occupation, spouse's occupation, marital duration, and pregnancy planning ( Clinical Implications: Midwives should provide evidence-based education and counseling to address sexual myths, thereby supporting healthier sexual experiences and improving well-being during pregnancy. Strengths and Limitations: This study is among the first to systematically examine this relationship; however, its cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and the findings may not be generalizable beyond the study population. Conclusion: Integrating sexual health education into routine prenatal care may enhance women's sexual quality of life during pregnancy. Highlight: This study is the first in the Central Black Sea Region of Türkiye to examine the impact of sexual myths on pregnant women's sexual quality of life.Sexual myths were found to be

Indexed as

midwiferypregnancysexual mythssexual quality of life

Identifiers

PMID42017135
PMCPMC13092729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.