ArticleSexual medicine2026
Correlatıonal effect of sexual myths on sexual qualıty of lıfe in pregnancy: a cross-sectıonal study.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sexual myths during pregnancy can shape women's beliefs about sexuality, increase anxiety, and reduce sexual satisfaction, thereby negatively affecting sexual quality of life. Aim: This study examined the relationship between sexual myths prevalent during pregnancy and women's sexual quality of life using a cross-sectional, correlational design. Methods: Conducted between January and April 2025, this study included 332 pregnant women attending the obstetrics outpatient clinic and wards of a university hospital. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a Personal Information Form, the Sexual Myths Scale, and the Sexual Quality of Life Scale. Outcomes: The primary outcome was sexual quality of life, assessed in relation to the level of endorsement of sexual myths during pregnancy. Results: Sexual myths varied significantly according to age, education, occupation, spouse's occupation, marital duration, and pregnancy planning ( Clinical Implications: Midwives should provide evidence-based education and counseling to address sexual myths, thereby supporting healthier sexual experiences and improving well-being during pregnancy. Strengths and Limitations: This study is among the first to systematically examine this relationship; however, its cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and the findings may not be generalizable beyond the study population. Conclusion: Integrating sexual health education into routine prenatal care may enhance women's sexual quality of life during pregnancy. Highlight: This study is the first in the Central Black Sea Region of Türkiye to examine the impact of sexual myths on pregnant women's sexual quality of life.Sexual myths were found to be
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.