ArticleFrontiers in climate2025
Developing a community-prioritized research agenda on primary care strategies for minimizing the health impacts of heat and poor air quality events: protocol.
Article in Frontiers in climate, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extreme Heat Exposure and Blood Pressure in Community Health Center Patients.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Extreme heat / poor air quality events can adversely impact health, and low-income communities are especially vulnerable to these impacts. Evidence-based interventions that minimize these impacts are needed and ideally will be developed and led by front-line organizations such as primary care community health centers (CHCs). A community-driven and -prioritized research agenda is necessary to guide the generation of evidence that CHCs need to intervene effectively. We will generate this agenda via the following protocol. Methods: We will first describe patterns of heat- and air quality-induced health impacts in a national CHC network (>2,400 clinics), focusing on hypertension and asthma. Results will be shared with advisors including: CHC staff and patients; representatives of community organizations focused on heat / air quality and health; and scientists with expertise in relevant fields. Advisors will identify additional needed analyses and consider potential interventions for interrupting the health impacts reflected in analysis results. Realist-informed qualitative data will be collected to identify likely mechanisms of effects of possible interventions. Using these inputs, we will identify a set of potential CHC-led interventions which will be categorized using a structured framework and then prioritized in terms of needed evidence on effectiveness, acceptability, and other factors. Several conceptual models guide this protocol. Results: This study began in Fall 2024, funded by the National Institutes of Health as a center planning grant. Quantitative analyses and qualitative data collection are underway, to be completed by Spring 2026; advisory committees will meet continuously through September 2027 to provide feedback, request additional analyses, generate potential interventions, and identify evidence needs and a related prioritized research agenda. Discussion: CHCs need evidence on: heat and air quality-induced health impacts in the populations they serve; how to intervene to minimize these impacts; and how to implement and sustain such interventions. Little prior research has identified or tested the effectiveness of such interventions in these settings. The process described here will create a research agenda on intervention effectiveness that reflects CHCs' needs. It will be the first research agenda developed in partnership with CHC staff and patients, community organizations, and multidisciplinary scientists in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.