Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42017026›Full record

ArticleOman medical journal2026

Prospective Comparative Study on the Relationship Between Adverse Maternal and Fetal Outcomes and the Total Number of Antenatal Visits: Evaluating the Focused Antenatal Care Model and Assessment of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Jesmitha Vijayan, Nitu Mishra, Aruna Kumar, Avani Ahuja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oman medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jesmitha VijayanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kannur Medical College, Kerala, India.
Nitu MishraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Aruna KumarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, India.
Avani AhujaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Antenatal care (ANC) visits during pregnancy aim to identify and address factors associated with unsafe pregnancy while educating pregnant women on the nuances of pregnancy and motherhood. The recommended number of visits varies across different countries. We compared the adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in participants with adequate ANC visits to the Focused ANC (FANC) model by the World Health Organization with those in the adequate and adequate plus categories of the Adequacy of the Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) index, to evaluate if the number of visits had any influence on these outcomes. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study among consenting participants who had received one or more antenatal visits elsewhere before presenting to our hospital for further care between January 2021 and September 2022. We collected details on previous pregnancy, prior ANC visits, adverse maternal, and fetal outcomes after delivery, and then statistically analyzed the data. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test, and the level of significance was set at Results: A total of 500 participants were included. Of these, 2.0%, 13.4%, 46.6%, and 38.0% received adequate plus, adequate, intermediate, and inadequate prenatal care, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between participants with adequate visits as per the FANC model and those with adequate and adequate plus visits as per the APNCU index in the distribution of high-risk factors in the index pregnancy, such as anemia, hypertensive disorder, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Similarly, statistically significant differences were found between adverse maternal outcomes like post-partum hemorrhage and intensive care unit admission, and adverse neonatal outcomes like preterm birth, low birth weight, birth asphyxia, neonatal hypoglycemia, meconium aspiration, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and stillbirth. Conclusions: Although the number of participants receiving adequate ANC based on the FANC model was greater than those in the adequate and adequate plus categories according to the APNCU index, the frequency of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes was higher in the FANC model. This most likely indicates that less frequent ANC visits are probably inadequate for the timely identification of issues of concern, and therefore for preventing adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

PregnancyPregnant WomenPrenatal Care

Identifiers

PMID42017026
PMCPMC13093137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.