ArticleJSES international2026
Does humeral head size predict the lateralization required to preserve near-anatomic posterosuperior rotator cuff length in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) lacks an anatomy-based framework for individualized implant planning. We hypothesized that native humeral head size (HHS) could serve as a patient-specific anatomical reference to guide lateralization in rTSA. The purpose of this study was to determine whether HHS predicts the amount of baseplate lateralization required to preserve near-anatomic posterosuperior rotator cuff muscle length, and whether muscle lengths can be reliably estimated in deformed joints using a statistical shape model (SSM). Methods: In this computational study, 83 pre-operative computed tomography scans were analyzed using a validated SSM to estimate rotator cuff muscle-tendon lengths. Five rTSA implantation strategies were modeled while controlling implant geometry, ranging from a medialized Grammont-type configuration to lateralized Frankle-type and hybrid strategies. Best-fit humeral head size was correlated with patient-specific lateralization quantified by overlap-based graft thickness and with posterosuperior cuff muscle length. Results: Best-fit humeral head size demonstrated an excellent correlation with graft thickness required for near-anatomic overlap (r = 0.93) and strong correlations with posterosuperior cuff muscle length, particularly the infraspinatus (r = 0.88), as well as the subscapularis (r = 0.76) and teres minor (r = 0.62). Among implantation strategies, the Frankle-type configuration most closely reproduced near-anatomic graft thickness and posterosuperior cuff muscle length. Implantation strategy produced large to very large differences in baseline muscle-tendon length across configurations (Kendall W ≈ 0.9-0.97). The SSM reliably reconstructed muscle-tendon geometry across a broad spectrum of degenerative pathology. Conclusion: HHS predicts the lateralization required to preserve near-anatomic posterosuperior cuff muscle length in rTSA. A Frankle-type lateralization strategy most closely reproduced the overlap-based anatomic reference, while alternative strategies produced systematic deviations in muscle length. These findings support HHS as an anatomy-based, patient-specific guide for lateralization planning. This framework is geometric and conceptual in nature and requires future clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.