Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42017011›Full record

ArticleDiscover public health2026

Impacts of listening practice on work performance while wearing hearing protection.

Patricia McClain, Matthew G Wisniewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patricia McClainKansas State University, Manhattan, USA.
Matthew G WisniewskiKansas State University, Manhattan, USA.

Funding

The role of prestimulus oscillatory brain dynamics in auditory memoryP20GM113109 · NIGMS · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI David Edward Thompson · 2017 to 2026
$24.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM113109NIOSH CDC HHS R03 OH012318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals who work in loud environments often choose not to wear hearing protection devices (HPDs) while on the job. A prevailing justification for this decision involves potential performance impairments that come with HPD use. While previous research has been successful in characterizing the overwhelming prevalence of this issue, the question of how to go about improving HPD use still remains. In this study, we investigated the possibility that performance while wearing an HPD could improve if people are given listening training with a simulated HPD. Participants listened to podcasts in which the audio was filtered to simulate wearing an HPD (trained condition) or left unfiltered (untrained condition). To quantify the impacts of this exposure on speech comprehension and multitasking performance, we employed a recently developed task that involves tracking on-screen moving objects with a computer mouse. In this task, listeners gain hypothetical dollars by closely tracking a target object that is continually updated via speech commands presented under simulated HPD or no HPD conditions. Results suggest that listening training can have positive impacts on performance. The trained condition outperformed the untrained condition in target object tracking while listening with and without a simulated HPD. Though this is a small study, with an artificial work task, our data suggest that the development and evaluation of listening training is worthy of further examination. The incorporation of listening training into hearing loss prevention programs in the workplace could serve to improve HPD use rates by addressing workers' core performance complaints. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12982-026-01897-z.

Indexed as

Hearing lossNoiseOccupational HealthPerceptual learningWorker Training

Identifiers

PMID42017011
PMCPMC13092542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.