ArticleDiscover public health2026
Impacts of listening practice on work performance while wearing hearing protection.
Article in Discover public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Worsened multitasking performance with simulated hearing protection correlates with individuals' choice not to "wear" it.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals who work in loud environments often choose not to wear hearing protection devices (HPDs) while on the job. A prevailing justification for this decision involves potential performance impairments that come with HPD use. While previous research has been successful in characterizing the overwhelming prevalence of this issue, the question of how to go about improving HPD use still remains. In this study, we investigated the possibility that performance while wearing an HPD could improve if people are given listening training with a simulated HPD. Participants listened to podcasts in which the audio was filtered to simulate wearing an HPD (trained condition) or left unfiltered (untrained condition). To quantify the impacts of this exposure on speech comprehension and multitasking performance, we employed a recently developed task that involves tracking on-screen moving objects with a computer mouse. In this task, listeners gain hypothetical dollars by closely tracking a target object that is continually updated via speech commands presented under simulated HPD or no HPD conditions. Results suggest that listening training can have positive impacts on performance. The trained condition outperformed the untrained condition in target object tracking while listening with and without a simulated HPD. Though this is a small study, with an artificial work task, our data suggest that the development and evaluation of listening training is worthy of further examination. The incorporation of listening training into hearing loss prevention programs in the workplace could serve to improve HPD use rates by addressing workers' core performance complaints. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12982-026-01897-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.