ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Optimizing a Novel eDNA-Based Framework for Reef Fish Biodiversity Monitoring Using an Autonomous Filtration System and in situ Nanopore Sequencing.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PIMENTO: a primer inference toolkit to facilitate large-scale calling of amplicon sequence variants.GigaScience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding emerged as a powerful method for biodiversity monitoring, offering non-invasive, reproducible, and scalable assessments. However, its implementation in marine environments and remote regions still presents significant technical and logistical challenges. Here, we tested several methodologies to propose a comprehensive field-adapted eDNA metabarcoding workflow, from sampling to taxonomic analysis, designed for the specific challenge of fish biodiversity monitoring in coral reefs, but transferable to various aquatic ecosystems. We use large-volume water sampling using a custom-built autonomous underwater filtration system, which reduces contamination risks, simplifies logistics, and enhances sampling consistency. In this frame, we assess the efficiency of our custom underwater filtration system, different filter porosities, and water volumes to optimize DNA yield, showing that 20 L filtered on a 1.2 μm pore-size filter was optimal for collecting fish eDNA. We chose the mitochondrial 12S rRNA for DNA amplification then Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing for its portability and compatibility with tropical fieldwork. We developed a high-resolution 12S reference database encompassing around 400 fish sequences, representing over 50% of the known fish biodiversity in French Polynesia. Finally, we benchmark eDNA-based biodiversity data against traditional visual census observations across multiple reef habitats and temporal replicates. Our approach enables high-resolution monitoring both at spatial and temporal scales while providing a more comprehensive assessment of fish biodiversity richness compared to visual census methods. Diel sampling revealed pronounced temporal structure, with nocturnal taxa enriched at night. This study validates a fully integrated eDNA metabarcoding workflow, from field collection to taxonomic analysis, in diverse and remote marine ecosystems, providing a scalable and cost-efficient framework solution for long-term biodiversity monitoring in remote regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.