Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42016917›Full record

ReviewEClinicalMedicine2026

Resynchronising care: addressing sex differences in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Laura van Pelt, Jonas Erzeel, Dominic A Theuns, Wilfried Mullens, Rudolf A de Boer, Pieter Martens, Chahinda Ghossein-Doha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura van PeltDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jonas ErzeelDepartment of Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg A.V., Genk, Belgium.
Dominic A TheunsDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Wilfried MullensDepartment of Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg A.V., Genk, Belgium.
Rudolf A de BoerDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Pieter MartensDepartment of Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg A.V., Genk, Belgium.
Chahinda Ghossein-DohaDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite compelling evidence for sex-based differences in cardiovascular disease, current guidelines for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remain predominantly informed by male-centric data. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is less prevalent in female individuals. As a result, female patients were less frequently enrolled in early landmark CRT trials (comprising only ∼20% of participants), thus limiting the statistical power needed to detect meaningful female-specific outcomes. Emerging evidence suggests that female patients derive greater benefit from CRT at shorter QRS durations (130-149 ms) compared to male patients (≥150 ms), particularly those with left bundle branch block and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Structural, electrical, and device programming differences may contribute to enhanced reverse remodelling and better clinical outcomes in females. However, these findings are seldomly reflected in guideline recommendations and rarely impact clinical decision-making, leading to underuse of CRT in eligible female patients. This Viewpoint calls for the integration of sex-specific analyses in CRT research, sex-specific recommendations in guidelines, and enhanced clinician awareness of sex-based differences.

Indexed as

Cardiac resynchronisation therapyCRTEquityHeart failureSex differencesWomen's health

Identifiers

PMID42016917
PMCPMC13092761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.