ReviewClinical neurophysiology practice2026
Translational prospectives for deep brain stimulation and low-intensity focused ultrasound neuromodulation: IFCN Handbook chapter.
Review in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The translation of experimental brain stimulation procedures to clinical practice remains a significant challenge. In the present book chapter we review emergent innovations that have recently surfaced or are imminent to make the leap, improving the treatment of patients with brain disorders. We focus on two domains of accelerated innovative potential in both invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation domains. First, current advances in deep brain stimulation (DBS) methodology are introduced. DBS is an established treatment for neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease, essential tremor and dystonia. Emerging technological advances focusing on when and how to stimulate allow for an extension and refinement of DBS promising scientific and clinical breakthroughs. We reflect on the unprecedented opportunities that MRI-based connectomics and neurophysiology based closed-loop DBS provide for patients with movement disorders, epilepsy and neuropsychiatric diseases. Next, we explore low-intensity focused transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) as an emergent non-invasive neuromodulation technique. Unlike electrical or magnetic methods, TUS combines millimeter spatial precision with the ability to reach deep brain targets, making it the closest non-invasive analogue to DBS. We summarize its candidate mechanisms of action, highlight advances in transducer hardware and skull aberration-correction strategies, and review early clinical studies across movement disorders, epilepsy, pain, and psychiatric indications. Together, these developments illustrate how TUS is progressing from proof-of-concept experiments toward biomarker-guided therapeutic protocols. In conclusion, this chapter provides an outlook on the future of invasive and non-invasive techniques, emphasizing the need for continued research and innovation to overcome challenges in translating experimental successes into effective clinical therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.