ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Long-Term Reproducibility of OCT Angiography Parameters in Patients with High Myopia.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the long-term reproducibility of OCT angiography parameters in patients with high myopia. Design: A retrospective study. Subjects: Patients with high myopia and normal controls. Methods: Subjects were divided into 2 groups: patients with high myopia (HM group) and normal controls (control group). Measurements of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, vessel density (VD) of superficial vascular complex (SVD), deep vascular complex (DVD), and choriocapillaris (CVD) were analyzed 3 times at 6-month intervals. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) values were calculated. Main Outcome Measures: Intraclass correlation coefficient and CV of SVD, DVD, and CVD. Results: A total of 194 eyes were enrolled: 99 in the HM group and 95 controls. In the HM group, the ICC/CV of FAZ area were 0.783/20.8%, versus 0.931/9.5% in controls. For SVD, values were 0.636/15.9% in HM group and 0.827/9.7% in controls; for DVD, 0.590/15.7% and 0.731/9.8%; for CVD, 0.672/9.8% and 0.842/7.2%, respectively. In linear regression analysis, image quality was associated with the CV of SVD (B = -1.38, Conclusions: Reproducibility of the FAZ area was relatively good, while SVD and CVD were moderate, and DVD was the poorest in high myopia. OCT angiography image quality had a significant impact on the long-term reproducibility of VD in all layers. Financial Disclosures: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.