ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Three Strategic Pillars for Implementing Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: "Three Strategic Pillars for Implementing Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy".JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
- Response to Vasileios Kalles et al.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical treatment of breast cancer has evolved from radical surgery to increasingly less invasive techniques, including nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), and more recently toward minimally invasive breast surgery (MIB), both endoscopic and robotic, particularly in high-volume centers, demonstrating encouraging oncologic and reconstructive outcomes in selected patients. Objective: To present a structured and practical guided framework, describing the three fundamental strategic axes for the safe implementation of endoscopic mastectomy, based on the experience of a pioneering center. Methods: We propose a structured model focused on: (1) clinical and oncologic foundations; (2) technical standardization and surgical logistics; and (3) outcomes assessment, training, and reproducibility. The center's initial experience, the systematization of the implementation process, and a reflection on its applicability are presented. Results: A patient selection protocol, an equipment-and-roles checklist, standardized technical steps, and a plan for data capture and training are provided. Conclusions: Endoscopic mastectomy can be successfully implemented within a structured institutional setting, with specialized training and appropriate equipment. This article offers an actionable pathway for other centers seeking to adopt this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.