Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42016899›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Three Strategic Pillars for Implementing Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Guillermo Gerardo Peralta Castillo, Paulina Bajonero Canónico, Ricardo Cavazos García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Response to Vasileios Kalles et al.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guillermo Gerardo Peralta CastilloBreast division, Hospital H+, Querétaro, Mexico. (Drs. Peralta Castillo and Bajonero Canónico).
Paulina Bajonero CanónicoBreast division, Hospital H+, Querétaro, Mexico. (Drs. Peralta Castillo and Bajonero Canónico).
Ricardo Cavazos GarcíaBreast Division, Hospital Angeles del Carmen, Jalisco, Mexico. (Dr. Cavazos Garcia).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical treatment of breast cancer has evolved from radical surgery to increasingly less invasive techniques, including nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), and more recently toward minimally invasive breast surgery (MIB), both endoscopic and robotic, particularly in high-volume centers, demonstrating encouraging oncologic and reconstructive outcomes in selected patients. Objective: To present a structured and practical guided framework, describing the three fundamental strategic axes for the safe implementation of endoscopic mastectomy, based on the experience of a pioneering center. Methods: We propose a structured model focused on: (1) clinical and oncologic foundations; (2) technical standardization and surgical logistics; and (3) outcomes assessment, training, and reproducibility. The center's initial experience, the systematization of the implementation process, and a reflection on its applicability are presented. Results: A patient selection protocol, an equipment-and-roles checklist, standardized technical steps, and a plan for data capture and training are provided. Conclusions: Endoscopic mastectomy can be successfully implemented within a structured institutional setting, with specialized training and appropriate equipment. This article offers an actionable pathway for other centers seeking to adopt this technique.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEndoscopyMastectomyMastectomy, SubcutaneousNipplesOrgan Sparing TreatmentsFemaleHumansPatient SelectionRobotic Surgical ProceduresBreast oncologyEndoscopic mastectomyLearning curveMinimally invasive surgery

Identifiers

PMID42016899
PMCPMC13094881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.