Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42016897›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2016

Safety and efficacy of manganese compounds (E5) as feed additives for all animal species: manganous carbonate; manganous chloride, tetrahydrate; manganous oxide; manganous sulphate, monohydrate; manganese chelate of amino acids, hydrate; manganese chelate of glycine, hydrate, based on a dossier submitted by FEFANA asbl.

EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for manganese.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) has assessed five manganese compounds: manganous chloride, tetrahydrate; manganous sulphate, monohydrate; manganous oxide; manganese chelate of amino acids, hydrate; manganese chelate of glycine, hydrate. The safety assessment is based on the assumption that the current maximum total contents of manganese authorised in feed are respected. All manganese compounds under application are considered safe for all animal species/categories. The mean manganese intake of the European population includes already the manganese from animal products and does not pose a toxicological concern. The effect of dietary manganese fed to animals on tissue concentrations is limited. Supplementation of feed with the manganese compounds under assessment would consequently not affect consumer exposure and is of no concern for consumer safety. All manganese compounds are considered as eye irritants, the manganese chelate of glycine and the manganese chelate of amino acids as irritants to skin and the latter one as dermal sensitiser. However, the presence of nickel in all additives may induce contact dermatitis. Exposure to manganese in dust of all additives and to nickel (except manganous chloride and manganous oxide) poses a risk to users by inhalation. The use of the manganese compounds under assessment in animal nutrition for all animal species is not expected to pose a risk to the environment. The manganese compounds under assessment are recognised as efficacious sources of manganese in meeting animals' requirements.

Indexed as

compounds of trace elementsefficacyenvironmentmanganesemanganese compoundsnutritional additivesafety

Identifiers

PMID42016897
PMCPMC13093161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.