ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Identify Emergency Department Patients at Increased Risk of New or Progressive Acute Kidney Injury.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and serious condition associated with prolonged hospitalization, chronic kidney disease, and increased mortality. Early prediction of AKI offers an opportunity to mitigate these adverse outcomes, yet existing models often fail to generalize to the emergency department (ED) setting, particularly for patients discharged directly to the community. We sought to develop and validate machine learning models that predict new or progressive AKI within 72 hours of ED departure, addressing challenges related to missing outcome data for discharged patients. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study of adult patients from 5 EDs within a large health-care system included adult patients with at least 1 serum creatinine measurement during their ED visit. AKI was defined using Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes serum creatinine-based criteria, and prediction models relied on demographic, clinical, and laboratory data routinely collected during ED care. Extreme gradient boosting algorithms were trained using 4 approaches to handle missing outcome data: incomplete case exclusion, negative outcome assumption, multiple imputation, and inverse probability weighting. Model performance was evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation and external temporal validation using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, precision, recall, calibration curve analyses, and measurement of diagnostic performance across a range of risk thresholds. Results: A total of 1,124,017 ED visits between 2017 and 2024 were included in the study; 5.7% (22,093) met AKI progression outcome criteria. The models demonstrated robust predictive performance for any new or progressive AKI (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.81-0.82) and severe AKI (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.87-0.88) across validation cohorts. Inverse probability weighting provided a reliable and consistent method for handling missing outcome data, ensuring accurate risk estimates for both hospitalized and discharged patients. Models performed similarly across diverse subgroups and ED sites. Conclusion: Machine learning models trained on routinely collected ED data can provide reliable early predictions of AKI progression, supporting actionable clinical decision making for a broad spectrum of patients. This study advances the real-world usability of such models by expanding their applicability to discharged patients and by enabling estimation of ongoing kidney risk, irrespective of AKI status on arrival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.