ArticleEngineering in life sciences2026
Design and Characterization of a 3D-Printable Membrane Aeration Module for Small-Scale Bioprocess Prototyping.
Article in Engineering in life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Design and Characterization of a 3D-Printable Membrane Aeration Module for Small-Scale Bioprocess Prototyping.Engineering in life sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oxygen transfer is a critical design parameter in laboratory-scale bioprocess systems used for prototyping, process development, and scale-down studies of mammalian cell cultures, particularly when cultivating shear-sensitive mammalian cells. In this work, we present the design and characterization of a 3D-printed modular, membrane-based aeration module that enables bubble-free oxygen transfer in laboratory reference cell-cultivation systems. The aeration module was developed as an external, small-scale unit intended for flexible integration into laboratory bioreactors and perfusion setups. Fabricated via fused deposition modeling, the final design features a three-chamber membrane-stacking architecture that ensures mechanical stability, tightness, and biocompatibility, while allowing for straightforward adaptation through editable CAD files. The system was experimentally evaluated with respect to oxygen transfer performance under varying relative liquid flow rates and membrane configurations (PTFE and PVDF), each with two different pore sizes (0.22 µm and 0.45 µm). Key performance parameters of the aeration module were determined and include dissolved oxygen (DO) profiles, volumetric oxygen transfer coefficients (7.26 h
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.