ArticleInternational journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health2026
Non-Medical Gender Affirming Practices Among Transgender Individuals: A Systematic Review on the Health Implications of Chest Binding and Genital Tucking.
Article in International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This systematic review describes health implications of two non-medical gender affirming practices: chest binding and genital tucking. Methods: In January 2024, three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and APA PsycINFO) were systematically searched using two comprehensive search terms related to: (1) chest binding or genital tucking, and (2) transgender people. Publications not in English, non-peer reviewed, insufficient data, and any forms of reviews were excluded. A manual search of relevant reviews and references was additionally done for additional resources. An updated search was done in July 2024. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024500400) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: This review included 18 studies (11 on chest binding, 7 on genital tucking) with a total of 3,235 participants. Negative implications were frequently reported, including dermatological issues, pain, hyperprolactinemia, breathing difficulties, testicular torsion, and poorer semen quality. However, some studies also found positive effects on dysphoria, life satisfaction, and mental health. Several studies highlighted lack of knowledge among healthcare providers about these practices. Conclusion: Chest binding and genital tucking have complicated tradeoffs between physical health risks and potential psychological benefits of reduced dysphoria. Further research is needed, especially on long-term effects, safer methods, and promoting education to build a supportive healthcare environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.