Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42016771›Full record

ReviewBiomedical reports2026

Platelet-rich plasma in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (Review).

Andrei-Alexandru Tomac, Cătălin Mircea Coșarcă, Cristian Trâmbițaș, Dorin Constantin Dorobanțu, Mihaela Pertea, Raluca Tilinca, Cosmin Carasca, Gergo Raduly, Maria Gabriela Rezmuves, Mariana Cornelia Tilinca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrei-Alexandru TomacDoctoral School of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'George Emil Palade' University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania.
Cătălin Mircea CoșarcăDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Mures County Emergency Hospital, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania.
Cristian TrâmbițașDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Mures County Emergency Hospital, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania.
Dorin Constantin DorobanțuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Mures County Emergency Hospital, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania.
Mihaela PerteaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, 'Saint Spiridon' Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700111 Iasi, Romania.
Raluca TilincaClinic of Epidemiology, Mures County Hospital, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania.
Cosmin CarascaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, 'George Emil Palade' University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania.
Gergo RadulyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Mures County Emergency Hospital, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania.
Maria Gabriela RezmuvesDepartment of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, Mures County Emergency Hospital, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania.
Mariana Cornelia TilincaDepartment of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, Mures County Emergency Hospital, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus represents a major global health concern, frequently complicated by chronic, non-healing wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). These ulcers are a leading cause of morbidity, impaired quality of life and limb amputation among individuals with diabetes. The impaired healing capacity observed in DFUs results from persistent inflammation, ischemia and a deficiency of local growth factors, which together hinder effective tissue regeneration. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), an autologous or allogeneic concentrate of platelets, fibrin, cytokines and leukocytes, has been proposed as a biologically active adjunct capable of accelerating tissue regeneration. The present study performed a narrative review of clinical trials and comparative studies assessing PRP therapy compared with the standard of care (SOC) in the treatment of DFUs. Across the reviewed literature, PRP demonstrated higher complete healing rates and a shorter time-to-closure compared with the SOC. In addition, a reduction in infection rates, pain intensity and ulcer recurrence was consistently reported, with minimal adverse effects. Both autologous and allogeneic PRP preparations were effective, and no major difference was observed between topical application and perilesional injection. In conclusion, PRP therapy represents a safe and promising option for enhancing wound healing in patients with DFUs. However, the lack of standardized preparation protocols and heterogeneous study methodologies underscores the need for well-designed, multicenter randomized trials to confirm these findings and to establish optimal treatment parameters.

Indexed as

diabetesdiabetic foot ulcerplatelet-rich-plasmaplateletsstandard of care

Identifiers

PMID42016771
PMCPMC13093009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.