ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
A novel magnetic resonance imaging-based classification of subscapularis muscle atrophy: reproducibility and clinical relevance.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration of rotator cuff are critical factors influencing surgical indications for rotator-cuff tears. However, no widely accepted method exists for the evaluation of subscapularis (SSC) atrophy. Based on our previous clinical experience, we hypothesized that SSC atrophy extends from the cranial side and proposed a novel magnetic resonance imaging-based classification of SSC atrophy. This study aimed to investigate the validity of the proposed classification and its relationship with clinical parameters. Methods: In total, 70 patients (72 shoulders; mean age, 62.3 ± 11.5 years) who underwent arthroscopic rotator-cuff repair or reverse shoulder arthroplasty were included. SSC atrophy was evaluated preoperatively on T1-weighted oblique sagittal images in the Y-shaped view, in which the lateral scapular spine and coracoid base were visualized. Atrophy was classified as follows: none (superior margin of the SSC extends beyond the anteroinferior edge of the coracoid base), mild (superior margin tapers below this edge), moderate (anteroposterior width is reduced at the scapular body-spine intersection), or severe (anteroposterior width is reduced at the inferior tip of the scapular body). Reproducibility was assessed by 2 shoulder surgeons using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). To evaluate clinical relevance, correlations between this classification and the SSC-tear size, fatty degeneration, and internal rotation strength were examined. In addition, sensitivity and specificity to detect the presence of a comma sign (retracted SSC tendon stump) were calculated using this classification. Results: The classification was applicable to all cases. Intrarater and inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC [1, 2] = 0.89, ICC [2, 1] = 0.85, respectively). Higher atrophy grades of SSC was significantly correlated with greater tear size, higher fatty degeneration grade, and lower internal rotation strength (Spearman ρ = 0.65, 0.64 and -0.42, respectively, Discussion: This classification, which was based on the craniocaudal extension of SSC atrophy, utilizes clear bony landmarks that enable a high reproducible and simple evaluation. Its significant associations with tear size, fatty degeneration, and internal rotation strength support its value as a clinically relevant indicator. Moreover, its ability to predict the presence of the comma sign suggests that the classification reflects both muscle atrophy and tendon retraction. Conclusion: The proposed magnetic resonance imaging-based classification of SSC atrophy demonstrated high reproducibility and validity, effectively reflecting tear size, tendon retraction, and internal rotation strength and thereby establishing its clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.