ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2026
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and preliminary construct validity of the Japanese version of the Parkinson's disease pain classification system.
Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The characterization of Parkinson's disease related pain based on the classification system: The severity of neuropathic pain and the clinical profile of nociplastic pain.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pain is a burdensome non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, its mechanisms are complex, complicating pain phenotyping. The PD Pain Classification System (PD-PCS) classifies pain mechanisms and their relationship with PD pathology. We developed a Japanese PD-PCS and evaluated its reliability and preliminary construct validity. Methods: The PD-PCS was translated and adapted under developer supervision using an ISPOR-guided process. People with PD and chronic pain were recruited from two hospitals (n = 31). Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the PD-PCS pain score and κ for categorical classifications (95% CIs). The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the smallest detectable change (SDC) were calculated. Construct validity was examined using Spearman's correlations between the PD-PCS pain score and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI; average pain, interference). Results: Cognitive debriefing identified wording issues that were resolved through revisions, resulting in the final Japanese version. Participants (n = 31) had a mean age of 70.5 ± 8.3 years, and 16 (51.6%) were men. The intra-rater reliability was good (ICC[3,1] = 0.768, 95% CI, 0.575-0.880; SEM 10.4; SDC_individual 29.0), and the inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC[2,1] = 0.917, 95% CI, 0.836-0.959; SEM 5.8; SDC_individual 16.0). The agreement between pain mechanisms and PD-related pain classification was substantial to perfect (κ = 0.755-1.000). The PD-PCS pain score correlated with BPI average pain (ρ = 0.744) and interference (ρ = 0.747). Conclusion: The Japanese PD-PCS demonstrated good to excellent reliability and preliminary construct validity, supporting its use in mechanism-informed pain classification in Japanese people with PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.