Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42016532›Full record

ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2026

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and preliminary construct validity of the Japanese version of the Parkinson's disease pain classification system.

Shuhei Ishida, Tomohiko Nishigami, Akira Mibu, Masahiro Manfuku, Hirofumi Yamashita, Yuta Tomooka, Norimasa Egusa, Shigeto Moriwaki, Kenichi Iwasa, Keiko Yamada and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shuhei IshidaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Shimane University Hospital, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Tomohiko NishigamiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health and Welfare, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Mihara, Hiroshima, Japan.
Akira MibuDepartment of Physical Therapy, Konan Women's University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Masahiro ManfukuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Breast Care Sensyu Clinic, Kishiwada, Osaka, Japan.
Hirofumi YamashitaDepartment of Rehabilitation, SKY Clinic, Ibaraki, Osaka, Japan.
Yuta TomookaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Fukuoka Orthopaedic Hospital, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan.
Norimasa EgusaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Shimane University Hospital, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Shigeto MoriwakiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Shimane University Hospital, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Kenichi IwasaDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Keiko YamadaPain Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi AbeDepartment of Neurology, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Sokichi ManiwaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pain is a burdensome non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, its mechanisms are complex, complicating pain phenotyping. The PD Pain Classification System (PD-PCS) classifies pain mechanisms and their relationship with PD pathology. We developed a Japanese PD-PCS and evaluated its reliability and preliminary construct validity. Methods: The PD-PCS was translated and adapted under developer supervision using an ISPOR-guided process. People with PD and chronic pain were recruited from two hospitals (n = 31). Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the PD-PCS pain score and κ for categorical classifications (95% CIs). The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the smallest detectable change (SDC) were calculated. Construct validity was examined using Spearman's correlations between the PD-PCS pain score and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI; average pain, interference). Results: Cognitive debriefing identified wording issues that were resolved through revisions, resulting in the final Japanese version. Participants (n = 31) had a mean age of 70.5 ± 8.3 years, and 16 (51.6%) were men. The intra-rater reliability was good (ICC[3,1] = 0.768, 95% CI, 0.575-0.880; SEM 10.4; SDC_individual 29.0), and the inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC[2,1] = 0.917, 95% CI, 0.836-0.959; SEM 5.8; SDC_individual 16.0). The agreement between pain mechanisms and PD-related pain classification was substantial to perfect (κ = 0.755-1.000). The PD-PCS pain score correlated with BPI average pain (ρ = 0.744) and interference (ρ = 0.747). Conclusion: The Japanese PD-PCS demonstrated good to excellent reliability and preliminary construct validity, supporting its use in mechanism-informed pain classification in Japanese people with PD.

Indexed as

ChronicpainCross-culturaladaptationPainphenotypingParkinson’sdiseaseReliability

Identifiers

PMID42016532
PMCPMC13092571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.