ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2026
Opicapone in Parkinson's patients with motor fluctuations: clinical assessments and patient-reported outcomes from the OPTI-ON study.
Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluated treatment outcomes of opicapone when used as add-on to levodopa in US patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing OFF episodes in clinical settings. Methods: The prospective, open-label, multicenter, observational OPTI-ON study examined patient characteristics, treatment outcomes, and safety/tolerability of Opicapone over 6 months. Clinician-reported outcomes included the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), and Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts IA and IV. Patient-reported outcomes included the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C), MDS-UPDRS Parts IB and II, and the novel Patient Global Impression of Severity in ON and OFF states (PGI-S ON and OFF) and Non-motor Fluctuation Assessment (NoMoFa). Results: The completer set included 161 patients (mean age, 66.8 years; PD duration, 7.8 years; fluctuation onset, 3.6 years). 38.0% of patients were 'very much/much improved' on CGI-C; 48.7% and 57.5% showed improvement on MDS-UPDRS Parts IA and IV, respectively; 23.5% of patients rated themselves 'very much/much improved' on PGI-C, and 49.5% and 56.5% reported improvements on MDS-UPDRS Parts IB and II, respectively. On PGI-S ON, the proportions of patients with 'none/very mild' PD symptoms during ON times were maintained, while, on PGI-S OFF, the proportion of patients with 'moderately to extremely severe' PD symptoms during OFF times decreased by 12.7%. NoMoFa Total Score improved in 48.0% of patients. Opicapone was generally well tolerated. Conclusions: In clinical practice, OPC treatment led to improvements in motor and non-motor fluctuations, quality of OFF episodes, and was generally well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.